There's no mistaking the fact that the original film was intended to be nothing more than a drive-in exploitation movie, but typical of Craven's output in the '70s, it was also a subversive examination of man's seemingly insatiable appetite for violent retribution. I bore you with this historical detail not to impress you with my Wikipedia skills, but rather to point out the inanity of the fact that we've had four films with the words 'The Hills Have Eyes' in the title, when really only one would have sufficed. Now we have 'The Hills Have Eyes 2,' a sequel to the 2006 remake that bears absolutely no relationship to Craven's 1985 sequel to his original. Fast-forward a couple of decades, and in 2006, amidst a string a recent remakes came a new version of 'The Hills Have Eyes,' directed by French shock auteur Alexander Aja ('High Tension'). Then, in 1985, Craven directed a cheap, completely dreadful sequel, 'The Hills Have Eyes 2,' which had little to do with the first film and was quickly forgotten. In 1977, Wes Craven unleashed 'The Hills Have Eyes,' a crude but effective little shocker that, alongside 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre' and Craven's own 'The Last House on the Left,' ranks as one of the most notorious horror flicks of the decade.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |